Veterinary dentistry: an unusual gingival lesion and
the approach to treatment
Last month’s case series article described an unusual lesion at the mucogingival line distal to the left maxillary canine in a dog (Photo 1). Radiography confirmed that the canine tooth was non-vital, resulting in destruction of the periapical bone and the production of the fistulous tract.
Therapeutic considerations are aimed at the underlying cause. The options in our case are extraction or root-canal therapy. Both have the potential to resolve the periapical inflammation/infection and the resulting fistula. The practitioner’s responsibility is to inform the client of the positive and negative aspects of both procedures and guide the decision based upon all factors involved.
When weighing the therapeutic options in this example, there are several components to explore. The order of importance may vary widely among individuals. The most predictable approach for resolution is extraction. It is in most cases a permanent resolution with little follow-up other than re-check confirmation of proper healing.
Root-canal therapy carries a good prognosis and, although not quite as predictable, carries an 88 percent success rate if periapical changes are evident. Many clients would like to preserve the existing dentition at all costs. Some would selectively like to save strategic teeth. Canines and carnassial teeth are large, therfore their roots occupy a large volume of space within the mandible and maxilla. They are the most common teeth pet owners choose to preserve. Others would rather extract, having no desire to save troubled teeth.
Extracting large teeth requires the creation of a mucoperiosteal flap and removal of considerable maxillary or mandibular bone, requiring post-operative pain management. Root-canal therapy, on the other hand, is relatively non-invasive.
The financial commitment may not even come into play for some; however, the majority of clients have limits in how far they will go with any procedure. However, most of us have learned that we shouldn’t make financial decisions for our clients.
Is either procedure within the comfort level of the clinician? Is there a specialist within a reasonable distance from the practice who can perform either procedure? Can the patient handle extended anesthetic times required for root-canal therapy? If a crown is placed, two anesthetic episodes are required, one for preparation of the tooth and the crown impression at the time of the root-canal procedure and another for crown placement.
Please note, crowns are desired in most cases to seal the access site and minimize or eliminate microleakage at the tooth and restoration interface. This is a major reason for root-canal failure. The factors just discussed bring us to the realization that root-canal therapy should be offered as an option in any case where a structurally sound, non-vital tooth is present. Clients must be informed and allowed to make decisions based on all options.
Root-canal therapy was the client’s desired option for this particular patient.
To communicate the options to our clients, it is important to understand the process involved in performing root-canal therapy. The following discussion is for client-education purposes, because this procedure is very technique-sensitive and should be performed only by veterinary dental specialists and members of the Veterinary Dentistry Mastermind with extensive training in endodontics.
Necrotic pulp contents and pulp that is chronically inflamed (pulpitis) generally lead to lesions like those seen in this case where periapical bone is destroyed. Removal of the diseased pulp contents therefore is the first step to resolution. Access to the pulp may be through the fracture site or it may be at another point on the tooth that provides better straight-line access to the apex to facilitate removal (Photo 2).
Access is made with a small, round carbide bur, and this coronal portion of the canal is enlarged using Gates-Glidden burs or files (Photo 3). An attempt is made to remove the pulp remnants with a barbed broach. Any of a variety of hand files or rotary filing systems are then used to remove remaining pulp, enlarge the canal and to ensure all diseased dentin is removed (Photo 4).
The canal is flushed between files with a number of disinfecting solutions, including chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. A 17 percent EDTA solution generally is used in a final chemical bath to remove debris that may be lodged in dentinal canals as a result of filing. Once the canal is clean and disinfected, it is flushed with saline, dried and filled with any one of a very large variety of obturation materials or systems containing a sealant and a sterile rubber material called gutta-percha (Photo 5).
Depending upon materials used in obturation and sealing, the access site is prepared for a composite restoration that will seal the tooth from oral cavity fluids and microbes. Crown preparation is then performed with diamond burs. An impression is made and sent for fabrication by a dental lab. The patient returns in two to four weeks for cementation of the crown, and the procedure is monitored yearly to ensure radiographic and gross evidence of success.
Root-canal therapy is technique sensitive, requiring considerable experience and expertise. Canals vary in shape, width and length, requiring special equipment to navigate them. Although there are many factors that can cause these procedures to fail, the general thought is that success is greater than 90 percent in canals where periapical changes are not evident.
Root-canal therapy is a viable option for resolution of cases such as this one. Other indications include intrinsically discolored teeth, teeth that are grossly normal but have radiographic evidence of pulp death and teeth with abrasion or attrition where the pulp has been compromised.
You may be wondering about the outcome of this case. We will discuss it in detail in the next article in this series.